The Western Confucian comments the situation for the Siamese monarchy:
Saturday, May 1, 2010
Wednesday, December 17, 2008
A Reply to The Economist
Dr. Surakiart Sathirathai, a former Deputy Prime Minister, responds in the Bangkok Post to the recent coverage of the Siamese monarchy in The Economist.
Posted by
J.K. Baltzersen
at
11:19 PM
0
comments
Labels: short note, Siam
Sunday, December 14, 2008
The Economist and the Siamese Monarchy
The Economist has an analysis of the Siamese monarchy, saying:
Other countries, from Spain to Brazil, have overcome dictatorial pasts to grow into strong democracies whose politics is mostly conducted in parliament, not on the streets. Thailand’s failure to follow suit is partly because “Father” has always been willing to step in and sort things out: his children have never quite had to grow up.It is interesting how they can tag subjects of a monarchy as not having grown up, whilst the adolescence of modern democratic politics is right before their eyes.
Posted by
J.K. Baltzersen
at
1:52 AM
0
comments
Sunday, September 7, 2008
The Siamese Monarchy
An interesting forum thread at the website of the Lonely Planet discusses the role of the Siamese King.
Posted by
J.K. Baltzersen
at
3:01 AM
0
comments
Labels: Siam
Wednesday, August 22, 2007
Bhumipol Explained
At the News Straits Times, W. Scott Thompson explains King Bhumipol and his reign to the Wilsonian world.
Posted by
J.K. Baltzersen
at
5:36 PM
0
comments
Labels: short note, Siam
Saturday, May 26, 2007
Western Lack of Understanding of Monarchy
In general, Westerners don't understand the role of King Bhumibol. So the Bangkok Post reports.
Could this be due to Wilsonian indoctrination?
Posted by
J.K. Baltzersen
at
9:21 PM
0
comments
Labels: short note, Siam