Sunday, March 23, 2008


Someone apparently believes she is the only constitutional monarchist in those United States.


Andrew said...

She is confused about a lot of things. "Constitutional Monarchy realises that the masses are peasants and do indeed need a nanny state"? I'd prefer she remain the only "constitutional monarchist" in America who believes things like that.

Lots of people are for "constitutional monarchy" so long as they get to be the one on the throne.

J.K. Baltzersen said...

Well, yes, Mr. Rogers.

I certainly do prefer monarchists such as the Knight of Lans, who debunked the Provider State, far over such monarchists who think "nanny state" is a term with a positive meaning.

The Knight of Lans is in a class for himself, of course, and even reaching to his knees is a challenge.