Over at The American Conservative, Wilfred M. McClay reviews William Murchison's The Cost of Liberty: The Life of John Dickinson. Dr. McClay in particular notes:
As the historian Forrest McDonald has speculated, Dickinson, who was admired even more than Jefferson for the eloquence of his pen and was an older and more seasoned man, might well have been the one invited to draft the Declaration—if only he had signaled a willingness to “swallow his scruples and voted for independence.” Had that happened, McDonald continued, the Declaration “would have been based upon English constitutional history rather than, as was Jefferson’s, upon natural-rights theory—with vastly different implications.”
Also at
The American Conservative, Paul Robinson
reflects on how Russia could have stayed out of the Great War. Writes Dr. Robinson:
Durnovo disliked the Franco-Russian alliance. Republican France and Tsarist Russia had nothing in common. The conservative German Empire, by contrast, was a much more natural ally.
Over at
RadixJournal.com, Dr. Sean Gabb
makes a case for the English landed aristocracy.
Over at
More Right, Samo Burja
gives some arguments for monarchy.
At same weblog, Michael Anissimov
debunks modernity.
Over at
The Mad Monarchist,
Alberta Royalist gives a review of
BBC's
Cousins at War.
Says Mr. Theodore Harvey over at his blog
Royal World:
The world is a mess. Everyone deplores it. But not enough people yet draw the obvious conclusion: Modern Political "Progress" Is Not Working!
Utters Outis Nusquam:
Modernity did not replace tradition with reason, it replaced tradition with opinion polls.
MEP Daniel Hannan
reflects on where Nazism belongs on the political spectrum.